textileplaybook.com / home · lessons
For AI agents →
04
Lesson 4 of 9 · The Textile Playbook

The Three Questions That Expose Bad Suppliers

Quick summary
Most suppliers aren't scammers — they're disorganized. These three questions expose where their process breaks down before you're holding a box of wrong-size polos with crooked logos.
Why it saves
Catches the “we'll figure it out” approach before it becomes your problem.
Bottom line
Named contact + proof process + per-piece QC = operational foundation.
≈ 2 min read
Prefer the paged experience?
Open in interactive reader →
Keyboard nav · jump menu
table

The Real Risk Categories

RiskWhat goes wrongCost
ExistenceGhost company, deposits disappear, nothing ships100% loss + deadline blown
ProductWrong sizes, poor quality, color mismatchRewrite or unusable stock
DecorationLogo shifted, wrong colors, messy backsideUnusable, client rejection
DeliveryLate, rushed packing, no QC, logos not cleanedMissed event + bad first impression
ServiceUnreachable during problems, no prototyping, rigidNo path to fix errors

→ Most reputable suppliers have solved the first two. The danger zone is decoration + delivery + service.

interview

The Three Questions

Q1Walk me through your logo approval process — what do I see before production starts?
Strong
Digital proof within 24h, physical sample on actual fabric for orders over €500, final production approval checkpoint
Medium
PDF proof only — screen calibration risk
Weak
“Just send us the file” or “We don't do proofs”
→ Screen colors ≠ thread colors. Navy on your monitor becomes purple on their machine.
Q2What does your quality check step look like?
Strong
Every piece checked, loose threads trimmed, backing removed, steamed/pressed, individually bagged
Medium
Spot-checking from each batch
Weak
“The embroiderer checks their own work”
→ “No time for individual checks on large orders” — quality scales down with quantity.
Q3If I need a last-minute change, how do I reach you and how fast do you respond?
Strong
Named team, phone / Signal / WhatsApp, under 2h response, production manager escalation
Medium
Email only, 24h response
Weak
“Leave a message, someone will get back to you”
→ No named contact = watching deadlines evaporate while “someone” eventually checks email.
rubric

Scoring Rubric

Question2 pts1 pt0 pts
Approval processPhysical + digital proofDigital onlyNo proof
Quality checkEvery piece, finishing includedSpot checkNo check
ResponsivenessNamed contact, fast channel, prototypingEmail, 24hNo named contact, vague
6 pts
Solid operational foundation
4–5 pts
Manageable with explicit written agreements
0–3 pts
High risk